CAPILLARY DESATURATION CURVE: DOES LOW SALINITY SURFACTANT FLOODING SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE THE RESIDUAL OIL SATURATION?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorZivar, Davood
dc.contributor.authorPourafshary, Peyman
dc.contributor.authorMoradpour, Nikoo
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-25T04:20:56Z
dc.date.available2021-01-25T04:20:56Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-02
dc.description.abstractDifferent oil displacement experiments conducted on sandstone and carbonate samples show that low salinity water (LSW) injection can reduce the residual oil saturation (ROS). Recently, surfactant flooding (SF) in combination with low salinity water (known as low salinity surfactant (LSS) flooding) is proposed as a potentially promising hybrid enhanced oil recovery (EOR) process. A lower ROS is reported for a LSS process compared to that seen in SF or with LSW at the same capillary number. The capillary desaturation curve (CDC) is a well-known tool to study the effect of viscous and capillary forces on ROS for different EOR techniques. In this study, ROS data of various LSW, SF, and LSS flooding experiments at different capillary numbers are collected to develop a CDC to analyze the performance of the hybrid LSS method. This can help to analyze the effect of the hybrid method on an extra improvement in sweep efficiency and reduction in residual oil. A lower ROS is observed for LSS compared to LSW and SF in the same capillary number range. Our study shows different behaviors of the hybrid method at different ranges of capillary numbers. Three regions are identified based on the capillary number values. The difference in ROS is not significant in the first region (capillary number in the range of 10−7–10−5), which is not applicable in the presence of surfactant due to the low interfacial tension value. A significant reduction in ROS is observed in the second region (capillary number in the range of 10−5–10−2) for LSS compared to SF. This region is the most practical range for SF and LSS flooding. Hence, the application of LSS provides a noticeable benefit compared to normal EOR techniques. In the third region (capillary numbers greater than 10−2), where the surfactant flooding is a better performer, the difference in ROS is negligible.en_US
dc.identifier.citationZivar, D., Pourafshary, P. & Moradpour, N. Capillary desaturation curve: does low salinity surfactant flooding significantly reduce the residual oil saturation?. J Petrol Explor Prod Technol (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-020-01074-1en_US
dc.identifier.issn2190-0566
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs13202-020-01074-1
dc.identifier.uri10.1007/s13202-020-01074-1
dc.identifier.urihttp://nur.nu.edu.kz/handle/123456789/5220
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology;
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectCapillary desaturation curveen_US
dc.subjectLow salinity water foodingen_US
dc.subjectSurfactant foodingen_US
dc.subjectResidual oil saturationen_US
dc.subjectCapillary numberen_US
dc.subjectLow salinity surfactant foodingen_US
dc.subjectResearch Subject Categories::NATURAL SCIENCES::Earth sciencesen_US
dc.titleCAPILLARY DESATURATION CURVE: DOES LOW SALINITY SURFACTANT FLOODING SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE THE RESIDUAL OIL SATURATION?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
workflow.import.sourcescience

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Zivar2021_Article_CapillaryDesaturationCurveDoes.pdf
Size:
901.48 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
6.28 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Articles