DSpace Repository

A COMPARISON OF MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS IN PREDICTING LITHOFACIES: CASE STUDIES FROM NORWAY AND KAZAKHSTAN

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Merembayev, Timur
dc.contributor.author Kurmangaliyev, Darkhan
dc.contributor.author Bekbauov, Bakhbergen
dc.contributor.author Amanbek, Yerlan
dc.date.accessioned 2021-08-27T08:33:53Z
dc.date.available 2021-08-27T08:33:53Z
dc.date.issued 2021-03-29
dc.identifier.citation Merembayev, T., Kurmangaliyev, D., Bekbauov, B., & Amanbek, Y. (2021). A Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms in Predicting Lithofacies: Case Studies from Norway and Kazakhstan. Energies, 14(7), 1896. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14071896 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1996-1073
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.3390/en14071896
dc.identifier.uri https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/7/1896
dc.identifier.uri http://nur.nu.edu.kz/handle/123456789/5726
dc.description.abstract Defining distinctive areas of the physical properties of rocks plays an important role in reservoir evaluation and hydrocarbon production as core data are challenging to obtain from all wells. In this work, we study the evaluation of lithofacies values using the machine learning algorithms in the determination of classification from various well log data of Kazakhstan and Norway. We also use the wavelet-transformed data in machine learning algorithms to identify geological properties from the well log data. Numerical results are presented for the multiple oil and gas reservoir data which contain more than 90 released wells from Norway and 10 wells from the Kazakhstan field. We have compared the the machine learning algorithms including KNN, Decision Tree, Random Forest, XGBoost, and LightGBM. The evaluation of the model score is conducted by using metrics such as accuracy, Hamming loss, and penalty matrix. In addition, the influence of the dataset features on the prediction is investigated using the machine learning algorithms. The result of research shows that the Random Forest model has the best score among considered algorithms. In addition, the results are consistent with outcome of the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher MDPI AG en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Energies;2021, 14(7), 1896; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14071896
dc.rights Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ *
dc.subject Lithology classification en_US
dc.subject Machine learning en_US
dc.subject Well log data en_US
dc.subject Type of access: Open Access en_US
dc.title A COMPARISON OF MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS IN PREDICTING LITHOFACIES: CASE STUDIES FROM NORWAY AND KAZAKHSTAN en_US
dc.type Article en_US
workflow.import.source science


Files in this item

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States

Video Guide

Submission guideSubmission guide

Submit your materials for publication to

NU Repository Drive

Browse

My Account

Statistics