Circularity Criteria and Indicators at the Building Component and System Level

dc.contributor.authorAidana Tleuken
dc.contributor.authorFerhat Karaca
dc.contributor.authorRand Askar
dc.contributor.authorGerald Leindecker
dc.contributor.authorİlker Kahraman
dc.contributor.authorChristina Giarma
dc.contributor.authorGenesis Camila Cervantes Puma
dc.contributor.authorRocío Pineda‐Martos
dc.contributor.authorIskander Bolatkhanov
dc.contributor.authorKaveh Mohammadpour
dc.contributor.authorLidiana Arrè
dc.contributor.authorA.A. Syed
dc.contributor.authorInam Ul Ahad
dc.contributor.authorLiljana Dimevska Sofronievska
dc.contributor.authorMeri Cvetkovska
dc.contributor.authorVanessa Tavares
dc.contributor.authorL. Bragança
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-26T11:29:31Z
dc.date.available2025-08-26T11:29:31Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-31
dc.description.abstractThe implementation of circular economy principles in building activities holds the potential for substantial environmental, economic, and social benefits. Although extensive research has examined the impact of circularity strategies on various aspects of buildings, there is a significant gap in the literature focusing specifically on building components and systems (BC&S). Most existing studies develop indicators applicable to buildings as a whole or solely at the materials level. This study aims to address this gap by identifying and emphasising specific circularity criteria for BC&S, including structure, infill, and services. The primary objective is to elucidate the contribution of each system to the overall circularity of buildings, thereby prioritising the most impactful circularity aspects. At the component level, it is essential to consider the specific attributes of component assemblies that constitute a system. To enhance the practical application of these findings, the study is supplemented with relevant case studies demonstrating best practices for circularity in BC&S. These case studies provide empirical evidence and practical examples of how targeted circularity strategies can improve the sustainability and efficiency of building practices, thereby advancing the goals of the circular economy.en
dc.identifier.citationTleuken Aidana, Karaca Ferhat, Askar Rand, Leindecker Gerald, Kahraman Ilker, Giarma Christina, Cervantes Puma Genesis Camila, Pineda-Martos Rocío, Bolatkhanov Iskander, Palermo Michele, Arrè Lidiana, Syed Ali Akbar Shah, Ahad Inam Ul, Sofronievska Liljana Dimevska, Cvetkovska Meri, Tavares Vanessa, Bragança Luís. (2024). Circularity Criteria and Indicators at the Building Component and System Level. Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-73490-8_13en
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-031-73490-8_13
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-73490-8_13
dc.identifier.urihttps://nur.nu.edu.kz/handle/123456789/10346
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Nature Switzerland
dc.rightsAll rights reserveden
dc.source(2024)en
dc.subjectComponent (thermodynamics)en
dc.subjectComputer scienceen
dc.subjectArchitectural engineeringen
dc.subjectEngineeringen
dc.subjectPhysicsen
dc.subjectThermodynamics; type of access: open accessen
dc.titleCircularity Criteria and Indicators at the Building Component and System Levelen
dc.typebook-chapteren

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Circularity_Criteria_and_Indicators_at_the_Building_Component_and_System_Level__a5f1abfc.pdf
Size:
477.51 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections