Evaluation of Component Algorithms in an Algorithm Selection Approach for Semantic Segmentation Based on High-level Information Feedback
Loading...
Date
Authors
Lukac, Martin
Abdiyeva, K.
Kameyama, Michitaka
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Zaporiz'kyi Natsional'nyi Tekhnichnyi Universytet (Zaporizhzhya National Technical University)
Abstract
In this paper we discuss certain theoretical properties of the algorithm selection approach to the problem of semantic segmentation in
computer vision. High quality algorithm selection is possible only if each algorithm’s suitability is well known because only then the algorithm selection result can improve the best possible result given by a single algorithm. We show that an algorithm’s evaluation score depends on final task; i.e. to properly evaluate an algorithm and to determine its suitability, only well formulated tasks must be used. When algorithm suitability is well known, the algorithm can be efficiently used for a task by applying it in the most favorable environmental conditions determined during the evaluation. The task dependent evaluation is demonstrated on segmentation and object recognition. Additionally, we also discuss the importance of high level symbolic knowledge in the selection process. The importance of this symbolic hypothesis is demonstrated on a set of learning experiments with a Bayesian Network, a SVM and with statistics obtained during algorithm selector training. We show that task dependent evaluation is required to allow efficient algorithm selection. We show that using symbolic preferences of algorithms, the accuracy of algorithm selection can be improved by 10 to 15% and the symbolic segmentation quality can be improved by up to 5% when compared with the best available algorithm.
Description
Citation
Lukac, M., Abdiyeva, K., & Kameyama, M. (2015). EVALUATION OF COMPONENT ALGORITHMS IN AN ALGORITHM SELECTION APPROACH FOR SEMANTIC SEGMENTATION BASED ON HIGH-LEVEL INFORMATION FEEDBACK. Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, 0(1). https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-3274-2016-1-11
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States
