SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF INCIDENCE AND PREVALENCE OF ENDOMETRIOSIS

dc.contributor.authorSarria-Santamera, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorOrazumbekova, Binur
dc.contributor.authorTerzic, Milan
dc.contributor.authorIssanov, Alpamys
dc.contributor.authorChaowen, Chen
dc.contributor.authorAsĂșnsolo-del-Barco, Angel
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-25T05:23:40Z
dc.date.available2021-01-25T05:23:40Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-30
dc.description.abstractThere is still much controversy regarding the epidemiology of endometriosis. The objective of this work is to conduct a systematic review, and if possible, proceed with a meta-analysis of studies that have analyzed the incidence and prevalence of this condition among women in the general population. The inclusion criteria were papers published after 1997 that had reported data of the incidence or prevalence of endometriosis. The PubMed search engine was used to identify papers meeting the inclusion criteria from 1997 to 2019, with an additional manual search for the identification of potentially eligible studies. The search was limited to papers published in English. The risk of bias was assessed according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist. As a result, 27 papers, which included a total of 28,660,652 women, were classified according to the type of design and sources of information in five subgroups. Pooled estimates of prevalence for studies with self-reported data were 0.05 (95% CI: 0.03; 0.06), 0.01 for population-based integrated information systems (95% CI: 0.01; 0.02), and 0.04 (95% CI 0.04; 0.05) in studies using other designs. The pooled incidence rate of endometriosis was: 1.36 per 1000 person-years (PY) (95% CI: 1.09; 1.63) for studies based on hospital discharges, 3.53 per 1000 PY (95% CI: 2.06; 4.99) for cohort studies, and 1.89 per 1000 PY (95% CI: 1.42; 2.37) for population-based integrated information systems. Meta-analysis indicated high heterogeneity based on I-squared statistics. This significant variability may not only be due to methodological issues and the specific limitations of the different designs and data analyzed, including case definitions and subject selection strategies, but also to the inherent heterogeneity of endometriosis. Epidemiological studies with appropriate study designs remain necessary to provide a valid estimation of the population burden of endometriosis.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSarria-Santamera, A., Orazumbekova, B., Terzic, M., Issanov, A., Chaowen, C., & AsĂșnsolo-del-Barco, A. (2020). Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Incidence and Prevalence of Endometriosis. Healthcare, 9(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9010029en_US
dc.identifier.issn2227-9032
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/9/1/29
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9010029
dc.identifier.urihttp://nur.nu.edu.kz/handle/123456789/5233
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesHealthcare;2021, 9(1), 29
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectResearch Subject Categories::MEDICINEen_US
dc.subjectendometriosisen_US
dc.subjectepidemiologyen_US
dc.subjectstatisticsen_US
dc.subjectnumerical dataen_US
dc.titleSYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF INCIDENCE AND PREVALENCE OF ENDOMETRIOSISen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
workflow.import.sourcescience

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
healthcare-09-00029 (1).pdf
Size:
2.6 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
6.28 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections