High mass-loading of sulfur-based cathode composites and polysulfides stabilization for rechargeable lithium/sulfur batteries

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Hara, Toru
Konarov, Aishuak
Mentbayeva, Almagul
Kurmanbayeva, Indira
Bakenov, Zhumabay

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Frontiers in Energy Research

Abstract

Although sulfur has a high theoretical gravimetric capacity, 1672 mAh/g, its insulating nature requires a large amount of conducting additives: this tends to result in a low massloading of active material (sulfur), and thereby, a lower capacity than expected. Therefore, an optimal choice of conducting agents and of the method for sulfur/conductingagent integration is critically important. In this paper, we report that the areal capacity of 4.9 mAh/cm2 was achieved at sulfur mass loading of 4.1 mg/cm2 by casting sulfur/ polyacrylonitrile/ketjenblack (S/PAN/KB) cathode composite into carbon fiber paper. This is the highest value among published/reported ones even though it does not contain expensive nanosized carbon materials such as carbon nanotubes, graphene, or graphene derivatives, and competitive enough with the conventional LiCoO2-based cathodes (e.g., LiCoO2, <20 mg/cm2 corresponding to <2.8 mAh/cm2). Furthermore, the combination of sulfur/PAN-based composite and PAN-based carbon fiber paper enabled the sulfurbased composite to be used even in carbonate-based electrolyte solution that many lithium/sulfur battery researchers avoid the use of it because of severer irreversible active material loss than in electrolyte solutions without carbonate-based solutions, and even at the highest mass-loading ever reported (the more sulfur is loaded, the more decomposed sulfides deposit at an anode surface).

Description

Citation

Hara, T., Konarov, A., Mentbayeva, A., Kurmanbayeva, I., & Bakenov, Z. (2015b). High Mass-Loading of Sulfur-Based cathode composites and polysulfides stabilization for rechargeable Lithium/Sulfur batteries. Frontiers in Energy Research, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2015.00022

Collections

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By