Why Images Cannot be Arguments, But Moving Ones Might

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMarc Champagne
dc.contributor.authorAhti-Veikko Pietarinen
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-20T10:38:19Z
dc.date.available2025-08-20T10:38:19Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01
dc.description.abstractStatic images cannot function as full arguments due to a dilemma between explicit or implicit conclusions, but moving images—through stepwise manipulation—provide a dynamic diagrammatic path that preserves argumentative structure.en
dc.identifier.citationChampagne, M.; Pietarinen, A-V. (2020). Argumentation, 34(2):207–236. DOI:10.1007/s10503-019-09484-0en
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10503-019-09484-0
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-019-09484-0
dc.identifier.urihttps://nur.nu.edu.kz/handle/123456789/9703
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherArgumentation (Springer)
dc.relation.ispartofArgumentationen
dc.rightsAll rights reserveden
dc.sourceArgumentation, 34(2), 207–236, (2020)en
dc.subjectvisual argumentsen
dc.subjectdiagrammatic reasoningen
dc.titleWhy Images Cannot be Arguments, But Moving Ones Mighten
dc.typeJournal Articleen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Why Images Cannot be Arguments, But Moving Ones Might.pdf
Size:
1.94 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Articles