DSpace Repository

A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE PERTURBED-CHAIN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATING FLUID THEORY EQUATION OF STATE AND MACHINE LEARNING MODELING APPROACHES IN ASPHALTENE ONSET PRESSURE AND BUBBLE POINT PRESSURE PREDICTION DURING GAS INJECTION

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Tazikeh, Simin
dc.contributor.author Davoudi, Abdollah
dc.contributor.author Shafiei, Ali
dc.contributor.author Parsaei, Hossein
dc.contributor.author Atabaev, Timur Sh.
dc.contributor.author Ivakhnenko, Oleksandr P.
dc.date.accessioned 2023-02-17T08:39:35Z
dc.date.available 2023-02-17T08:39:35Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.identifier.citation Tazikeh, S., Davoudi, A., Shafiei, A., Parsaei, H., Atabaev, T. S., & Ivakhnenko, O. P. (2022). A Comparison between the Perturbed-Chain Statistical Associating Fluid Theory Equation of State and Machine Learning Modeling Approaches in Asphaltene Onset Pressure and Bubble Point Pressure Prediction during Gas Injection. ACS Omega, 7(34), 30113–30124. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c03192 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://nur.nu.edu.kz/handle/123456789/6956
dc.description.abstract Predicting asphaltene onset pressure (AOP) and bubble point pressure (Pb) is essential for optimization of gas injection for enhanced oil recovery. Pressure-Volume-Temperature or PVT studies along with equations of state (EoSs) are widely used to predict AOP and Pb. However, PVT experiments are costly and time-consuming. The perturbed-chain statistical associating fluid theory or PC-SAFT is a sophisticated EoS used for prediction of the AOP and Pb. However, this method is computationally complex and has high data requirements. Hence, developing precise and reliable smart models for prediction of the AOP and Pb is inevitable. In this paper, we used machine learning (ML) methods to develop predictive tools for the estimation of the AOP and Pb using experimental data (AOP data set: 170 samples; Pb data set: 146 samples). Extra trees (ET), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree, and k-nearest neighbors ML methods were used. Reservoir temperature, reservoir pressure, SARA fraction, API gravity, gas−oil ratio, fluid molecular weight, monophasic composition, and composition of gas injection are considered as input data. The ET (R2: 0.793, RMSE: 7.5) and the SVM models (R2: 0.988, RMSE: 0.76) attained more reliable results for estimation of the AOP and Pb, respectively. Generally, the accuracy of the PC-SAFT model is higher than that of the AI/ML models. However, our results confirm that the AI/ML approach is an acceptable alternative for the PC-SAFT model when we face lack of data and/or complex mathematical equations. The developed smart models are accurate and fast and produce reliable results with lower data requirements. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher ACS Omega en_US
dc.rights Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ *
dc.subject Type of access: Open Access en_US
dc.subject Gas Injection en_US
dc.subject Predicting asphaltene onset pressure en_US
dc.title A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE PERTURBED-CHAIN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATING FLUID THEORY EQUATION OF STATE AND MACHINE LEARNING MODELING APPROACHES IN ASPHALTENE ONSET PRESSURE AND BUBBLE POINT PRESSURE PREDICTION DURING GAS INJECTION en_US
dc.type Article en_US
workflow.import.source science


Files in this item

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States