DSpace Repository

Evaluating the Energy Efficiency of PCM-Integrated Lightweight Steel-Framed Building in Eight Different Cities of Warm Summer Humid Continental Climate

Система будет остановлена для регулярного обслуживания. Пожалуйста, сохраните рабочие данные и выйдите из системы.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Jangeldinov, Baurzhan
dc.contributor.author Memon, Shazim Ali
dc.contributor.author Kim, Jong
dc.contributor.author Kabdrakhmanova, Marzhan
dc.date.accessioned 2020-05-12T07:21:53Z
dc.date.available 2020-05-12T07:21:53Z
dc.date.issued 2020-03-16
dc.identifier.citation Jangeldinov, B., Memon, S. A., Kim, J., & Kabdrakhmanova, M. (2020). Evaluating the Energy Efficiency of PCM-Integrated Lightweight Steel-Framed Building in Eight Different Cities of Warm Summer Humid Continental Climate. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2020. en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4381495
dc.identifier.uri http://nur.nu.edu.kz/handle/123456789/4644
dc.description.abstract Phase change materials have been applied to a building framework to decrease energy and fossil fuel consumption as well as make the building sector more sustainable. Lightweight structures are attractive and increasingly being used in residential buildings. Hence, in this research, the energy efficiency and thermal performance of buildings located in eight various cities (Helsinki, Kiev, Saint Petersburg, Moscow, Stockholm, Toronto, Montreal, and Kiev) of warm summer humid continental climate (Dfb) were evaluated. The impact of heating and cooling energy savings pattern on the selection of optimum phase change material for each city has been demonstrated. In addition, the impact of volume of PCM, precisely the effect of varying and constant volume, on energy savings was assessed for the lightweight steel-framed building. Simulations were performed in EnergyPlus by applying eleven melting temperature ranges of PCM. Test results demonstrated that energy savings were higher in the swing season and the maximum temperature reduced during these months was 3.3°C. Heating and cooling energy savings were found to strongly influence the selection of optimum PCM. In cities where cooling energy savings were the highest, the optimum PCMs were PCMs 24-26 while in cities where heating energy savings were the highest, the optimum PCM was found to be PCM 21. For constant volume, the performance of optimum PCM raised when the surface area was enlarged, while the thickness of PCM was reduced. Overall, the application of PCM into lightweight steel-framed residential structure located in warm summer humid continental climate region is a feasible option. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Hindawi en_US
dc.rights Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ *
dc.subject Research Subject Categories::NATURAL SCIENCES::Physics::Elementary particle physics en_US
dc.title Evaluating the Energy Efficiency of PCM-Integrated Lightweight Steel-Framed Building in Eight Different Cities of Warm Summer Humid Continental Climate en_US
dc.type Article en_US
workflow.import.source science


Files in this item

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States