DSpace Repository

What Went Wrong? A Five-School Review of Master’s Theses Reference List

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Yap, Joseph M.
dc.contributor.author Groen, Carlene
dc.contributor.author Kamilova, Yelizaveta
dc.contributor.author Terzi, Paschalia
dc.contributor.author Zvonareva, Darya
dc.date.accessioned 2018-08-06T04:32:56Z
dc.date.available 2018-08-06T04:32:56Z
dc.date.issued 2018-08-03
dc.identifier.citation Yap, J.M., Groen, C., Kamilova, Y., Terzi, P. & Zvonareva, D. (2018). What went wrong? A five-school review of master’s theses reference list. The Reference Librarian. DOI: 10.1080/02763877.2018.1503989 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1541-1117
dc.identifier.uri http://nur.nu.edu.kz/handle/123456789/3378
dc.description.abstract A good citation and referencing practice starts when a student correctly cites and follows the specified citation format. Academic integrity is closely associated with plagiarism but there is another particular error that academics neglect to verify: the proper formatting of a reference list based on a particular citation style. The purpose of the study is to trace, review and analyze the reference list of selected master’s theses submitted to one of the leading universities in Kazakhstan. Results showed a high number of referencing errors. Having a standard format will prevent future mistakes. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Routledge en_US
dc.subject referencing en_US
dc.subject reference formats en_US
dc.subject graduate students en_US
dc.subject theses en_US
dc.subject Kazakhstan en_US
dc.title What Went Wrong? A Five-School Review of Master’s Theses Reference List en_US
dc.type Article en_US
workflow.import.source science

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Video Guide

Submission guideSubmission guide

Submit your materials for publication to

NU Repository Drive


My Account