DSpace Repository

A comparison of search strategies to design the cokriging neighborhood for predicting coregionalized variables

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Madani, Nasser
dc.contributor.author Emery, Xavier
dc.contributor.editor Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment
dc.contributor.other Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment
dc.date.accessioned 2018-08-09T08:26:15Z
dc.date.available 2018-08-09T08:26:15Z
dc.date.issued 2018-07-06
dc.identifier.citation Madani, N., Emery, X. (2018). “A comparison of search strategies to design the cokriging neighborhood for predicting coregionalized variables”. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, DOI: 10.1007/s00477-018-1578-1. en_US
dc.identifier.other DOI: 10.1007/s00477-018-1578-1
dc.identifier.uri http://nur.nu.edu.kz/handle/123456789/3380
dc.description.abstract Cokriging allows predicting coregionalized variables from sampling information, by considering their spatial joint depen- dence structure. When secondary covariates are available exhaustively, solving the cokriging equations may become pro- hibitive, which motivates the use of a moving search neighborhood to select a subset of data, based on their closeness to the target location and the screen effect approximation. This paper investigates the efficiency of different strategies for designing a sub-optimal neighborhood wherein the simplification of the cokriging equations is challenging. To do so, five alternatives (single search, multiple search, strictly collocated search, multi-collocated search and isotopic search) are tested and com- pared with the reference unique neighborhood, through synthetic examples with different data configurations and spatial joint correlation models. The results indicate that the multi-collocated and multiple searches bear the highest resemblance to the reference case under the analyzed spatial structure models, while the single and the isotopic searches, which do not differentiate the primary and secondary sampling designs, yield the poorest results in terms of cokriging error variance. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The first author acknowledges the Nazarbayev University for funding this work via ‘‘Faculty development compet- itive research Grants for 2018–2020’’ under Contract No. 090118FD5336. The second author acknowledges the Chilean Com- mission for Scientific and Technological Research (CONICYT), through Grant CONICYT PIA Anillo ACT1407. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment en_US
dc.rights CC0 1.0 Universal *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ *
dc.subject Screening effect en_US
dc.subject Multi-collocated cokriging en_US
dc.subject Strictly collocated cokriging en_US
dc.subject Markov-type models en_US
dc.subject Intrinsic correlation en_US
dc.subject Cokriging neighborhood en_US
dc.subject Heterotopic sampling en_US
dc.title A comparison of search strategies to design the cokriging neighborhood for predicting coregionalized variables en_US
dc.type Article en_US
workflow.import.source science


Files in this item

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC0 1.0 Universal Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC0 1.0 Universal

Video Guide

Submission guideSubmission guide

Submit your materials for publication to

NU Repository Drive

Browse

My Account

Statistics